Hi, On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 10:25:46AM -0700, Ian Cox wrote: > >I've heard different rumors on the actual implementation, though. So maybe > >you can clarify? > > > >One rumor was that SXH and SR* still have *all* flows in the netflow TCAM, > >and only filter on output, in the RP CPU. > > This is not how per interface works. Flows are only created in the > netflow table for interfaces it is enabled on. Interfaces without > netflow enabled drive a null flow mask and this results in no entries > being created in the netflow table for those interfaces. If you > enable nde on an interface this results in a non-null flow mask being > used and an entry being created in the table.
This is *very* good news.
(And which is why I explicitely flagged it as "rumor" - because nobody
seemed to know for sure).
If Cisco ever ships our 6506 (as replacement for the 7606-S that can't
run SXH) I'm looking very much forward to test-drive SXH2...
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fax: +49-89-35655025 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgp4EcqGlOTy1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
