Hi, On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 10:54:15AM -0700, virendra rode // wrote: > hmm, so does that mean enabling netflow on the main interface and not > sub-interface(s) won't collect netflow and /or populate netflow table > for the sub-interface?
Please note that this thread was explicitely talking about 6500/7600
hardware...
> doing a quick test on my lab router 2800 running 12.4(10c)
... and that's almost the "most different" thing Cisco builds these days
regarding router architecture.
> shows netflow
> collector gathering data from sub-interface w/ "ip route-cache flow"
> enabled on the main interface or am I confusing myself?
>
> sh ip cache flow shows traffic being sourced from sub-interface.
Don't use "ip route-cache flow" (which is a "early stone age" command,
and can only be set on the main interface, and automatically enables
flow accounting for all sub-interfaces).
Use "ip flow ingress", which is per-subif.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fax: +49-89-35655025 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpbqDR4LmSi0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
