-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > > Can anyone tell me the difference between the interface command: > > Router(config-if)# ip flow ingress > Router(config-if)# ip flow egress - ------------------- ip flow ingress is recommended for 12.4 and >. Then again, I have devices w/ 12.4 code running ip route-cache flow w/o any problems. If you wish to monitor only ONE interface then use,
ip flow ingress ip flow egress Each interface needs to have ip flow ingress enabled in order to be monitored. > > And > > Router(config-if)# ip route-cache flow - ------------------ I guess it is antiquated from what I've gathered but works w/o any problems (head scratching). route-cache flow performs ingress and monitors traffic off all interfaces w/o enabling it individually. there's more on the list, just look at archives. regards, /virendra > > Thanks. Second part to this question is anyone recommend a Netflow > analyzer? Either application or appliance (price is important.) I'd like > to get one where I can assign clients access where they only have access to > the ports I assign them. I'm currently using the free version of > Scrutinizer. > > Thanks all! > > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIG2vwpbZvCIJx1bcRAjwQAKCpPirXqK4rokWwjL2GYGckhWK47QCgxZ3+ YtKs5+IFSFKPrlCFs2cn1iw= =RVNF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
