Hi,
Should the following work on a 6500 (12.2(18)SXF10):
ip vrf custxxx
rd yyyy:110118
import map IMPORT-INTO-CUSTXXX
route-target import yyy:110
route-target export yyy:110
route-map IMPORT-INTO-CUSTXXX permit 10
match extcommunity 110
set weight 100
ip extcommunity-list 110 permit RT:yyyy:110
The routes get imported, but the weight remains unset.
The whole setup looks like this:
-------session 1-------
CUST PE1
-------session 2-------
-------session 3-------
CUST PE2
-------session 4-------
Due to existing arrangements sessions 1 & 3 are supposed to be the
primary ones, 2&4 backup ones (links that carry primary sessions have
higher cir guarantees through third-party metro provider) . So if one
of the primary sessions on the PE(1/2) goes down the other primary
session (on the other PE) should be used. And only if both primary
ones go off - local secondary one. So far we only had one set of
sessions (only PE1 and sessions 1 & 2) and that worked quite well with
the weight. Is there a way to make it work with weight or should I use
something else to influence the decision?
kind regards
Pshem
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
