Hi All,
2008/6/5 Peter Rathlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi Pshem, > > I tested it on SXF5 and SXF13 and had no problems with the import > setting weight with the bits you wrote. I take it that the "yyy:110" in > the route-targets are the same as "yyyy:110" in the extcommunity-list, > even though there's a "y"'s difference, right? :-) yeap, they're the same :-) But I wrote that about 4.30am, so I got a bit confused. > But as David mentioned, weight is local to the router, so how will you > have it prefer circuits 1,3,2,4 in that order? Local preference + MED > seems to be the right way to influence the decison. I think I explained it wrong ;-) . The preference was supposed to be 1 or 2 and 3 or 4 (which weight would cover ok), so local circuits should be preferred above remote ones. Since weight should work (and it clearly doesn't) then I'll settle for local-pref + MED. Thx for your help. kind regards Pshem _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
