> has anyone used /31 network instead of /30? I believe this is recommended to > use /31 network? Need expert comments.
Support still seems very limited, but on a similar thread, has anyone toyed with the 'ip unnumbered for Ethernet' feature? Initially it was just option-82 magic, but I noticed there's now also a "poll" option to support non-DHCP hosts: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst4500/12.2/37sg/configuration/guides/unnumber.html There's the single message from a CLI example: "Warning: dynamic routing protocols will not work on non-point-to-point interfaces with IP unnumbered configured." ...though without more discussion on the underlying functionality, that's terribly vague (ie. would explicit neighbor configurations remedy the limitiation?). _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
