Thanks for the fast answer!! :D El lun, 07-07-2008 a las 11:35 +0200, Pavel Skovajsa escribió: > Hi, > no this is not possible. Etherchannel is always one logical device to > another logical device. > > For example two 2950 to each other. > Or stack of 3750 to one 2950 > or stack of 3750 to stack of 3750 > or the newest edge bleeding etherchannel setup (google up MEC) is: VSS > 1440 (2x650x) to 2950 > > pavel > > > > On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 11:16 AM, luismi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I need to redesign an smaill network here. > > It is working with now with just a 2950 but I would like to improve the > > availability. > > > > I have some dudes that they will be probably answered in some place in > > Internet but I didn't find that place yet. > > > > The actual scenario is: > > 1 x 2950 connected to a 3750 stack > > > > The future scensario I would like to have is: > > 2 x 2950 connected to a 3750 stack > > > > Well, the reason to use 2950 is that we have several 2950 switches here > > and there is no reason to make a new invesment since they are enough for > > our requirements, they load is also quite small. > > > > I would like to do a cluster with the 2950 switches probably using some > > GigaStack Gbics. > > > > The question is... > > As soon as I create the cluster in the 2950 switches, is it possible to > > create a port-channel (one port from one 2950 and one port from the > > other 2950) against a port-channel at the 3750 stack side? > > > > I hope someone in this list can answer that. > > > > Thanks in advance. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > >
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
