Thanks Ben, however what do you mean by "better off load balancing with a routing protocol and/or cef" ? is it disabling the load balancing? as I know this feature enable by default on routing protocol as long as they are equal admin distances. And is it for traffic out to the internet or traffic coming to the customer ? regards. Edi
----- Original Message ---- From: Ben Steele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Edi Guntoro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 12:12:12 PM Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco MMPPP the LAC is pretty irrelevant, you need to configure MMPPP capabilities on your LNS's, which means an sgbp group on your LNS's for the multichassis and "ppp multilink" under your virtual template for the MPPP side of things. I noticed your topology is using 2 seperate wireless services to provide the bundle, one word of warning is if the bundles are out of sync (speed and latency wise) you will see very poor performance and you are better off load balancing with a routing protocol and/or cef. Ben On 16/07/2008, at 2:13 PM, Edi Guntoro wrote: > Dear ciscoers, > Let's say we have a scenario to bring up multiple ppp for our > customer to increase bandwidth to the internet. > At the moment we only have access to the LNS, is it possible to have > MMPPP for our customer, or is there something to do with the LAC? > any reference? > here is the layout: > regards > Igun > > > u /-----3.5g service---PPP---LAC---LNS1--| > s/ | > ___internet > e\ | > r \-----cdma service--PPP---LAC---LNS2--| > > > > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
