i'm talking strictly between your LNS and your CPE here, if you find
your MMPPP is giving poor performance due to physical differences
between the 2 sessions (ie speed and latency), then try doing
something a little more creative like multihopping both ppp sessions
onto the one router and using (as you mentioned) cef per-destination
load sharing over the 2 unique ppp sessions, or alternatively let a
routing protocol handle the work and advertise part of your subnet out
one link and part out the other with redundancy, or even GRE tunnels
etc etc.. there are quite a few ways you can achieve the desired
outcome, this is of course only if your mmppp fails.
Cheers
Ben
On 16/07/2008, at 4:11 PM, Edi Guntoro wrote:
Thanks Ben,
however what do you mean by "better off load balancing with a
routing protocol and/or cef" ? is it disabling the load balancing?
as I know this feature enable by default on routing protocol as long
as they are equal admin distances.
And is it for traffic out to the internet or traffic coming to the
customer ?
regards.
Edi
----- Original Message ----
From: Ben Steele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Edi Guntoro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 12:12:12 PM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco MMPPP
the LAC is pretty irrelevant, you need to configure MMPPP capabilities
on your LNS's, which means an sgbp group on your LNS's for the
multichassis and "ppp multilink" under your virtual template for the
MPPP side of things.
I noticed your topology is using 2 seperate wireless services to
provide the bundle, one word of warning is if the bundles are out of
sync (speed and latency wise) you will see very poor performance and
you are better off load balancing with a routing protocol and/or cef.
Ben
On 16/07/2008, at 2:13 PM, Edi Guntoro wrote:
> Dear ciscoers,
> Let's say we have a scenario to bring up multiple ppp for our
> customer to increase bandwidth to the internet.
> At the moment we only have access to the LNS, is it possible to have
> MMPPP for our customer, or is there something to do with the LAC?
> any reference?
> here is the layout:
> regards
> Igun
>
>
> u /-----3.5g service---PPP---LAC---LNS1--|
> s/ |
> ___internet
> e\ |
> r \-----cdma service--PPP---LAC---LNS2--|
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
