It will take it but the reordering overhead will be huge with that many members.
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 04:49:53PM -0700, Brandon Price wrote: > Just for the heck of it I Bundled all 28 once in a lab with a NPE400 on > one end and a NPE300 on the other.. > > I was able to pull about 40mbps or so across the link.. if memory serves > me correct the cpus spiked pretty high.. above 90% I think... I didn't > do a whole lot of testing but it definitely took all 28 members... > > > Brandon > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel Lacey > Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 3:51 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [c-nsp] 7206 12.2(18) Maximum # of MLPPP T1s on PA-MC-T3 > > Hi all, > > cisco 7206VXR (NPE300) processor (revision B) with 229376K/65536K bytes > of memory. > R7000 CPU at 262Mhz, Implementation 39, Rev 1.0, 256KB L2 Cache > 6 slot VXR midplane, Version 2.0 > > I found that the PA-MC-T3 card will handle 12 T1 links in one MLPPP > group and still use HW. > After 12, the 7206 will go into SW mode for the MLPPP bundle. > > How many T1s can I use, albeit in SW mode, can I bundle together? > > I know I can bundle across PA-MC-T3, again in SW mode, but how many > total T1s can I bundle across two PA-MC-T3 cards? > > How about where I will run into performance issues? > > Thanks in advance! > Dan > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
