Hi, On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 09:21:37AM -0400, Rich Davies wrote: > Has anyone ever utilized Unicast RPF (reverse path forwarding) to help > mitigate this limitation on the SUP2's? I have also ran into the same > limitation with our SUP2's (full BGP routing table, multiple peering > sessions) and I have read that enabling Unicast RPF would help temporarily > alleviate the TCAM memory being exhausted
You have read funny stuff. Enabling uRPF on the SUP2 *halves* the
available TCAM space, to 128k routes.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fax: +49-89-35655025 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpPhg6JYPBwV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
