Do you need full routing tables? Jon Lewis emailed a week ago about how to reduce the table by filtering the bgp feeds to get the table to fit. I think that the routing/connectivity should be fine for a hosting provider.
http://jonsblog.lewis.org/ which can be used until you are in a position to upgrade or Cisco come out with a FIB optimization, which will never happen. How did Cisco come out with so many 720s that the compatibility matrix is so complicated? Oli -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Kunkel Sent: 03 September 2008 18:59 To: [email protected] Subject: [c-nsp] Dreaded FIB Exception on Sup2 Well, I've hit the dreaded error message on my Sup2: %MLSCEF-SP-7-FIB_EXCEPTION: FIB TCAM exception, Some entries will be software switched I've done a lot of reading on this (cisco.com, this list, etc.), with the conclusion that this supervisor engine is likely just at the end of its useful lifetime, but I figured I'd double check I wasn't missing anything. This happened when I started getting a full routing table from a provider today. We're connected to one peering point and another aggregation-style provider, and are in the process of adding a Cogent connection (hold any tempting comments on that one, please). LBi. The global marketing and technology agency. Winner: Media Guardian Design Innovation Award 2008 LBi Ltd is registered in England and Wales, the registered number and address are 03080409, Truman Brewery, 146 Brick Lane, London, E1 6RU. This email may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any unauthorised copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
