On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 09:50:26AM +0300, Saku Ytti wrote: > > > Just out of curiosity what were main points that left you > > > wanting? > > > > QinQ termination, EoMPLS, VPLS. > > EoMPLS was show stopper for me, would have EFT'n it to see > more closely otherwise. > VPLS I don't care, EoMPLS + 7600 as 'vpls hub' is fine > for my somewhat rare VPLS needs. > > QinQ would definitely be show stopper for me too. Are you > sure it's not there? At least it can be configured, but > couldn't find anyone with ASR1k who could test it on this > short notice.
We did some basic testing today on 2.1.1 and it worked fine so far (basic pinging): interface GigabitEthernet0/3/1.1 encapsulation dot1Q 500 second-dot1q 199 ip address 10.199.0.2 255.255.255.252 ! interface GigabitEthernet0/3/1.2 encapsulation dot1Q 500 second-dot1q 200 ip address 10.200.0.2 255.255.255.252 Best regards, Daniel -- CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0 _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
