This puzzles me. I do policy routing met set VRF. However it looks like
still the global routing table is used:
Sep 19 20:48:12.439: IP: s=192.168.0.2 (GigabitEthernet0/2),
d=192.168.10.1, len 84, PBR Counted
Sep 19 20:48:12.439: IP: s=192.168.0.2 (GigabitEthernet0/2),
d=192.168.10.1, len 84, FIB policy routed set vrf
Sep 19 20:48:12.439: IP: s=192.168.0.2 (GigabitEthernet0/2),
d=192.168.10.1, len 84, FIB policy match
Sep 19 20:48:12.439: IP: s=192.168.0.2 (GigabitEthernet0/2),
d=192.168.10.1, len 84, FIB policy routed set vrf
Sep 19 20:48:12.439: IP: s=192.168.0.2 (GigabitEthernet0/2),
d=192.168.10.1, len 84, input feature, Policy Routing(49), rtype 0,
forus FALSE, sendself FALSE0
Sep 19 20:48:12.439: IP: tableid=0, s=192.168.0.2 (GigabitEthernet0/2),
d=192.168.10.1 (GigabitEthernet0/1), routed via FIB
First messages say that set vrf is matched. However the last line just
implies it goes throug the global routing table.
GigabitEthernet0/1 is the default gateway of the global routing table.
kind regards Rinse
Rodney Dunn schreef:
What I'm saying is if you are seeing the problem on SRC1 it can't
be CSCsk27643.
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 09:59:19PM +0200, Rinse Kloek (Solcon) wrote:
I tried this feature on a 7200 with SRC1 (also on SB6). (SRB does not
run on 7200).
regards Rinse
Rodney Dunn schreef:
It's already fixed in SRC and SRB4.
That bug was only an issue in SRA throttle.
Have you tried SRB4?
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 09:07:16PM +0200, Rinse Kloek (Solcon) wrote:
We are also running in some bug ( CSCsk27643 ) and are hoping to see
this fixed in SRC2. Anybody some tips to get PBR using set vrf working
on a 12.2 release ?
regards Rinse
[email protected]
Hi All,
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 6:35 PM, Bas Roos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anyone know when 12.2(33)SRC2 is supposed to be released, specifically
for the 7600. I had heard by the end of July, but so far no release.
The latest statement we got from them was end-september.
Anyone from Cisco perhaps would comment on this?
CSCso45720 makes it really problematic to go into production stage
with the SRC train.
Cheers,
--
Ran.
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
