Show me your configuration.
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 08:55:46PM +0200, Rinse Kloek (Solcon) wrote: > This puzzles me. I do policy routing met set VRF. However it looks like > still the global routing table is used: > > Sep 19 20:48:12.439: IP: s=192.168.0.2 (GigabitEthernet0/2), > d=192.168.10.1, len 84, PBR Counted > Sep 19 20:48:12.439: IP: s=192.168.0.2 (GigabitEthernet0/2), > d=192.168.10.1, len 84, FIB policy routed set vrf > Sep 19 20:48:12.439: IP: s=192.168.0.2 (GigabitEthernet0/2), > d=192.168.10.1, len 84, FIB policy match > Sep 19 20:48:12.439: IP: s=192.168.0.2 (GigabitEthernet0/2), > d=192.168.10.1, len 84, FIB policy routed set vrf > Sep 19 20:48:12.439: IP: s=192.168.0.2 (GigabitEthernet0/2), > d=192.168.10.1, len 84, input feature, Policy Routing(49), rtype 0, > forus FALSE, sendself FALSE0 > Sep 19 20:48:12.439: IP: tableid=0, s=192.168.0.2 (GigabitEthernet0/2), > d=192.168.10.1 (GigabitEthernet0/1), routed via FIB > > First messages say that set vrf is matched. However the last line just > implies it goes throug the global routing table. > GigabitEthernet0/1 is the default gateway of the global routing table. > > kind regards Rinse > > Rodney Dunn schreef: > >What I'm saying is if you are seeing the problem on SRC1 it can't > >be CSCsk27643. > > > >On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 09:59:19PM +0200, Rinse Kloek (Solcon) wrote: > > > >>I tried this feature on a 7200 with SRC1 (also on SB6). (SRB does not > >>run on 7200). > >> > >>regards Rinse > >> > >>Rodney Dunn schreef: > >> > >>>It's already fixed in SRC and SRB4. > >>> > >>>That bug was only an issue in SRA throttle. > >>> > >>>Have you tried SRB4? > >>> > >>>On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 09:07:16PM +0200, Rinse Kloek (Solcon) wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>>We are also running in some bug ( CSCsk27643 ) and are hoping to see > >>>>this fixed in SRC2. Anybody some tips to get PBR using set vrf working > >>>>on a 12.2 release ? > >>>> > >>>>regards Rinse > >>>>[email protected] > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>Hi All, > >>>>> > >>>>>On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 6:35 PM, Bas Roos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>Anyone know when 12.2(33)SRC2 is supposed to be released, > >>>>>>>specifically > >>>>>>>for the 7600. I had heard by the end of July, but so far no release. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>The latest statement we got from them was end-september. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>Anyone from Cisco perhaps would comment on this? > >>>>>CSCso45720 makes it really problematic to go into production stage > >>>>>with the SRC train. > >>>>> > >>>>>Cheers, > >>>>>-- > >>>>>Ran. > >>>>>_______________________________________________ > >>>>>cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > >>>>>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > >>>>>archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>_______________________________________________ > >>>>cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > >>>>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > >>>>archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > >>>> > >>>> > >>_______________________________________________ > >>cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > >>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > >>archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > >> _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
