Lol - thanks...;) I wish EoMPLS was possible for us but it's not.... so we're back to l2tpv3 ...
Best, Paul -----Original Message----- From: Gert Doering [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: October 1, 2008 4:31 AM To: Paul Stewart Cc: 'Michael K. Smith'; 'cisco-nsp' Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Transparent LAN over Layer3 Hi, On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 10:20:40PM -0400, Paul Stewart wrote: > If we could hand them off a few VLAN's we would just do that and not > even use Q-in-Q unless we really needed to... but basically I'm > looking for > layer2 transport via layer3 devices... and there's no option for MPLS > in this setup... EoMPLS would be the way to go - if you can do MPLS. If not, the remaining alternatives are L2TPv3 or "briding over GRE tunnels". The former is meant to be used for this - and the latter will make Rodney Dunn throw spikey things after me (and rightly so). So - go for L2TPv3. gert -- USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW! //www.muc.de/~gert/ Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [EMAIL PROTECTED] fax: +49-89-35655025 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
