Thanks Gert. I suspected that was the case. I am probably displaying my VRF/MP-BGP ignorance here, but is there any technical reason Cisco could not allow you to run BGP in a VRF without doing VPNV4 similar to how you can run an IGP in a VRF?
-----Original Message----- From: Gert Doering [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 3:29 AM To: Murphy, William Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco BGP Running on VRF? Hi, On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 05:50:17PM -0500, Murphy, William wrote: > I have a Cat6506 VSS720-3C-XL switch on which I have configured BGP on > a VRF using "address-family ipv4 unicast vrf internet". I am getting > BGP routes and all appears well but I can only display BGP info by > using "show ip bgp vpnv4 ..." commands. I didn't intend to run VPNV4 > and it Well, if you don't want VPNV4, then don't configure a VPNV4 address family - which you did by configuring "vrf internet". Non-VPNV4-BGP is configured in "address-family ipv4 unicast", without any "vrf" things tacked to it. gert -- USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW! //www.muc.de/~gert/ Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [EMAIL PROTECTED] fax: +49-89-35655025 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
