On Wed, October 1, 2008 8:12 pm, Murphy, William wrote: > Thanks Gert. I suspected that was the case. I am probably displaying > my VRF/MP-BGP ignorance here, but is there any technical reason Cisco > could not allow you to run BGP in a VRF without doing VPNV4 similar to > how you can run an IGP in a VRF?
Am I missing part of the question here? You can run BGP fine in an addresses family - I do this all the time for vrf-lite on CEs with a session to the PE in each VRF for each VPN. I think it still creates the vpnv4 address family, but you don't have to configure any peers in it. The commands are slightly confusing in this instance though, it *is* still 'show ip bgp vpnv4 vrf ...' to show the bgp table for the VRF, even though you're not using the VPNV4 session. Regards, Tim. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
