Hi,

We had a 1006 with ESP10G from Cisco.
1000 sessions, 90k pps, 800M, 1-2% CPU.

Tom


Roddy Strachan írta:
> Actually testing/implementing one now.
> 
> One test we had about 12-13000 sessions on it, CPU was about 12%
> 
> That was a rough figure...
> 
> 
> 
> On 30/11/08 9:00 PM, "MKS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>> Hi
>>
>> Has anyone any experience using the ASR 100x as a bras, terminating pppoe.
>> Some traffic/sessions vs CPU load info would be great (on or off list)
>> Cisco clams up to 32.000 session, does that hold?
>>
>> Regards
>> MKS
>>
> 
> 
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
>  solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. 
> Please notify the sender immediately by email if you have received this 
> email by mistake and delete this email from your system. Please note that
>  any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the
>  author and do not necessarily represent those of the organisation. 
> Finally, the recipient should check this email and any attachments for 
> the presence of viruses. The organisation accepts no liability for any 
> damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to