Looks like every thousand user uses 1% CPU. What kind of features did
you enable (BGP/OSP/ACL's ? )
Roddy Strachan schreef:
Actually testing/implementing one now.
One test we had about 12-13000 sessions on it, CPU was about 12%
That was a rough figure...
On 30/11/08 9:00 PM, "MKS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
Has anyone any experience using the ASR 100x as a bras, terminating pppoe.
Some traffic/sessions vs CPU load info would be great (on or off list)
Cisco clams up to 32.000 session, does that hold?
Regards
MKS
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
Please notify the sender immediately by email if you have received this
email by mistake and delete this email from your system. Please note that
any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the
author and do not necessarily represent those of the organisation.
Finally, the recipient should check this email and any attachments for
the presence of viruses. The organisation accepts no liability for any
damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
