Thanks for those who helped with this. I am ashamed to admit that despite my best intent at testing this thoroughly it was indeed a duplex mismatch (Doh!). That fixed the problem in my test environment, now I need to find out where it is in the prodcution setup and correct it.
Thanks again, Tony. --- On Wed, 31/12/08, Marko Milivojevic <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Marko Milivojevic <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 3550 routing performance > To: [email protected] > Date: Wednesday, 31 December, 2008, 2:36 AM > On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 08:01, Tony > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I should have included that in my original post, I had > already set SDM to routing extended-match. If you don't > you get a warning when you add a VRF to prompt you to do it. > > > > Unfortunately not something that obvious. > > I'm a bit slow in reading the mailing lists :-). > > Did you reload the switch after you applied new SDM > template? Also, > are you sure that you are not experiencing "duplex > mismatch" or some > similar issue? Do interface counters show anything unusual? > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
