Hi, On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 09:19:54AM -0700, Brandon Bennett wrote: > In all honesty it's a stupid term as VRF technology isn't tied to MPLS > at all. Yes vrf is required for l3 vpns but so is mBGP and we don't > have mBGP-lite :)
Well, mBGP is not strictly required... you can do L3 VPNs just fine with
any other routing protocol (which is VRF aware), but it might be less
convenient - and is certainly scaling less well.
(You'd need dedicated per-VRF links between your PE routers, of course)
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [email protected]
fax: +49-89-35655025 [email protected]
pgpFcVpbt9QsL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
