William,
Note that some of those config items are optional. The base config from
Michael would be:
interface Multilink1
description Multiplexed Logical Connection to remote site
ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
no ip redirects
no ip proxy-arp
ppp multilink
ppp multilink fragment disable
ppp multilink group 1
interface Serial1/0/19:0
description Connected to remote site (circuit 1)
no ip address
no ip redirects
encapsulation ppp
ppp multilink
ppp multilink group 1
Be careful with URPF. You may not need to modify your queues...probably
don't unless you understand it.
And please, do not disable unreachables.
tv
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Malitsky" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 11:20 AM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Per packet load balancing with low latency
Don't have a link handy, but here is a sample of the config we use. You
can view status using
show ppp multilink
interface Multilink1
description Multiplexed Logical Connection to remote site
ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
ip access-group inbound in
ip access-group outbound out
ip verify unicast source reachable-via rx
no ip redirects
no ip unreachables
no ip proxy-arp
no peer neighbor-route
fair-queue 1024 256 0
ppp multilink
ppp multilink fragment disable
ppp multilink group 1
interface Serial1/0/19:0
description Connected to remote site (circuit 1)
no ip address
no ip redirects
no ip unreachables
no ip proxy-arp
encapsulation ppp
no fair-queue
ppp multilink
ppp multilink group 1
interface Serial1/0/21:0
description Connected to remote site (circuit 2)
no ip address
no ip redirects
no ip unreachables
no ip proxy-arp
encapsulation ppp
no fair-queue
ppp multilink
ppp multilink group 1
Sincerely,
Michael Malitsky
Message: 8
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:55:48 +0000
From: William <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Per packet load balancing with low latency
applications
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Message-ID:
<[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Can anyone point me to some decent documentation on setting up MLPPP
with serial links? Google/Cisco.com is not liking my key words today.
Thanks for your time.
W
2009/1/15 <[email protected]>:
> Hi,
>> Yes, age old question.
>>
>> Use layer 2 technologies such as MLPPP.
>
> yep - you caan then choose the appropriate load balancing
> method so media streams for the same target go down them same pipe.
> missing packets are generally okay for most modern streaming
> systems...they ignore them..you might get a little glitch if you
> are unlucky....but packets arriving out of order? ouch.
>
> alan
>
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/