> But I guess we'll finally opt for letting the Cisco QA be enough as a > guarantee the devices work (there's always RMA) and have Alex's suggestion be > the winner here, just be as nebulous as you can and follow the "ill-defined > and metaphysical characteristique" of such undefined term as "Acceptance Test > Procedure" > I'd ask the customer: > Are you married? Did you fill an ATP form before you said "Yes, I do" ??? > No??? Then c'mon, gimme a break!!! It's just a darn router we're talking > here, not chaining your entire life with the same woman!! > A router can be replaced when malfunctioning, with a wife it's a bit more > difficult, isn't it??
Actually there are best practices to that also, see http://www.iambored.co.za/funny/girlfriend-v10-v20/ Rubens _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
