On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 10:53 +0100, Peter Rathlev wrote: > In short: I assumed that the BGP "network X mask Y" statement required > the exact prefix to exist in the RIB; that it wasn't enough for some > subnet of this to exist. (Disregarding any redistribute X + > aggregate-address etc.) Am I wrong in assuming that?
I tested this on the same CPE in another VRF and that works as expected; the /24 prefix isn't announced when configuring the /21 network statement. A /21 Null0 prefix is announced as expected. So it seems to be a bug. It's a C3560 running 12.2(35)SE5 IP Services. I'll start searching the Bug Toolkit and Release Notes... Regards, Peter _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
