Mike,
The 6500 and 4500 have the "switch fabric" on the supervisor engines, so by
having dual supervisors, you in effect have a redundant fabric.

The 6748 actually has 4 traces, each 20G.  2 traces connect to the active
supervisor containing the active switch fabric.  The remaining 2 traces are
standby connections to the standby supervisor/fabric.  So, when a supervisor
engine and its fabric fails, the 2 standby traces are enabled and the full
40G of bandwidth remains.  You never, under normal circumstances, have only
a single trace active on 6748.  Newer versions of IOS provide a "hot
standby" fabric feature which allows this fabric trace switch over to happen
faster - roughly 50ms.

For the best in redundant designs, consider the Nexus 7000, where the switch
fabric is decoupled from the supervisor engines into a series redundant
"fabric modules" installed into the back of the switch.  Should a supervisor
engine fail in Nexus 7000 there is ZERO impact to the switch fabric, because
the supervisor engine does not forward data plane traffic.

Cheers,

Brad Hedlund
[email protected]
http://www.internetworkexpert.org


On 3/31/09 9:05 AM, "Mike Louis" <[email protected]> wrote:

> I have a solution design that requires redundant switch fabrics. I am
> interpreting this beyond just have redundant supervisors meaning redundant
> backplanes on the switch cards. Do the 6500 and 4500 support redundant
> fabrics? Will a 6748 function with one trace failed?
> ________________________________
> Note: This message and any attachments is intended solely for the use of the
> individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that
> is non-public, proprietary, legally privileged, confidential, and/or exempt
> from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
> notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this
> communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication
> in error, please notify the original sender immediately by telephone or return
> email and destroy or delete this message along with any attachments
> immediately.
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/




_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to