In Ciscoland, that is redundant sups.
I would recommend asking for clarification and educating on how redundant
sups and redundant boxes provide some different resiliency options.
tv
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Louis" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 9:05 AM
Subject: [c-nsp] Redundant switch fabric
I have a solution design that requires redundant switch fabrics. I am
interpreting this beyond just have redundant supervisors meaning redundant
backplanes on the switch cards. Do the 6500 and 4500 support redundant
fabrics? Will a 6748 function with one trace failed?
________________________________
Note: This message and any attachments is intended solely for the use of
the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
information that is non-public, proprietary, legally privileged,
confidential, and/or exempt from disclosure. If you are not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this communication in error, please notify the original
sender immediately by telephone or return email and destroy or delete this
message along with any attachments immediately.
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
