"Elmar K. Bins" <[email protected]> writes: > So, the conclusion is: The mgt port is absolutely useless for me and I > could have saved the money on it. Mgt Ethernet will take one of the > precious ports on the SP, and it will make ACLs and route filtering > necessary, too.
The mgmt port should perhaps be thought of as an ethernet version of the console port? Personally, I would prefer that to be the case; the more it looks like a serial port + a terminal server + a power control bar, the better. /Benny _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
