Yes, this is true, ES20 is 7600 only (I missed the 6500 angle here ;-) ) We can do VPLS with SIP400 (lower BW) or SIP600 (higher BW).
BTW, There is also support for MPLSoGRE Arie From: Marlon Duksa [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 17:10 To: Arie Vayner (avayner) Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [c-nsp] MPLS/IP-VPN capable cards on Cat 6500 Thanks Arie. But ES cards are not supported on Cat6500, no? And also VPLS over MPLS on a SIP in Cat6500 - is it supported? If so do you know which SIP? Thanks, Marlon On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 9:19 PM, Arie Vayner (avayner) <[email protected]> wrote: Marlon, If you have DFCs on the regular LAN cards, then EoMPLS and L3VPN will be done in hardware and in distributed forwarding mode. For VPLS, you need to have either an ES20/ES40 card or a SIP card facing the core. Having this card means that again VPLS is done in hardware - some functionality is done on the regular DFCs and some on the egress core facing module. Arie -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Marlon Duksa Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 02:07 To: [email protected] Subject: [c-nsp] MPLS/IP-VPN capable cards on Cat 6500 Hi -Does anyone know which cards on Cat6500 support MPLS and separately IP-VPN, posibly at 40Gbps throughput? I'm looking for a distributed (DFC) forwarding solution? I know that Cat6500 is very limited in VPLS support, but IP-VPN and EoMPLS should be no problem, right? Thanks, Marlon _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
