What does that have to do with L2TPv3? On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 11:09, Ge Moua <[email protected]> wrote:
> I've done testing for both: > * no encryption: ~ 980Mb > * encryption ~ 240 Mb > > Performance dependent on router platform (in my case 7203 w/ NSE-100) > > Encryption was on 7206 w/ NPE-G1 & VAM2+ > > Conclusion, performance limited to hardware used and not layer-1 link > speed. > > > > Regards, > Ge Moua | Email: [email protected] > > Network Design Engineer > University of Minnesota | Networking & Telecommunications Services > > > > > Chris Fournier wrote: > >> Does anyone use L2TPv3 over a gig link, and what is the performance >> overhead introduced? I've seen some numbers at the Cisco website, but >> these seem to reference encryption versus encapsulation. >> >> >> Chris >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ >> >> > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
