The (2) scenarios is:
* L2TPv3 vc w/ no ecryption
vs.
* L2TPv3 vc w/ IPSec encryption (encapsulated inside of)

One can also do layer-2 VPN with MPLS, eg, AToM (EoMPLS), but I think the initial thread was about L2TPv3 (layer-2 VPN inside native IP). Persoanally I like the AToM/EoMPLS (or even VPLS) approach with the many-to-many connections flexibility (vs. one-to-one connection limitation with L2TPv3).

We have about a half-dozen sites on L2TPv3 but have considered AToM/EoMPLS. Just in case your wondering Cisco TAC has far more in-depth expertise w/ MPLS flavors as I've been told; when you run into issues.

Good luck.

Regards,
Ge Moua | Email: [email protected]

Network Design Engineer
University of Minnesota | Networking & Telecommunications Services



Aaron wrote:
What does that have to do with L2TPv3?

On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 11:09, Ge Moua <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    I've done testing for both:
    * no encryption: ~ 980Mb
    * encryption ~ 240 Mb

    Performance dependent on router platform (in my case 7203 w/ NSE-100)

    Encryption was on 7206 w/ NPE-G1 & VAM2+

    Conclusion, performance limited to hardware used and not layer-1
    link speed.



    Regards,
    Ge Moua | Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

    Network Design Engineer
    University of Minnesota | Networking & Telecommunications Services




    Chris Fournier wrote:

        Does anyone use L2TPv3 over a gig link, and what is the
        performance
        overhead introduced? I've seen some numbers at the Cisco
        website, but
        these seem to reference encryption versus encapsulation.


        Chris

        _______________________________________________
        cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>
        https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
        archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
    _______________________________________________
    cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
    archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to