Why are you not including E4 or E4+ ? I'm asking this because i saw a E4 hitting the maximum when the number of CEF routes handled doubled (from 280k to 560k). To the E3, this transition was smooth... And i'm not able to find docs that could explain this...
Thanks. Regards, Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (R&S) [email protected] -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Roland Dobbins Sent: quinta-feira, 18 de Junho de 2009 1:55 To: Cisco-nsp Subject: Re: [c-nsp] full routing table / provider-class chassis On Jun 18, 2009, at 6:59 AM, Jo Rhett wrote: > I'd prefer something that can handle both edge and core duties. GSR w/E3 or E5 LCs, CRS-1, or ASR 1K. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Roland Dobbins <[email protected]> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com> Unfortunately, inefficiency scales really well. -- Kevin Lawton _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
