[email protected] wrote: > since all the pptp traffic gets process switched, Cisco would not meet the > feasibility condition on Router; if i were you i will use a linux (Intel > Core 2 Duo,4 Gig Mem) box running poptop (http://www.poptop.org/) for such > a huge and increasing number of pptp users. > Or if your more of a FreeBSD person, MPD is also a very good solution (http://mpd.sourceforge.net/)
Vince > Regards, > Masood > Blog: http://weblogs.com.pk/jahil/ > > >> I'm in the unfortunate position of having to support a bunch (100 or >> so now, 300 or so very soon) PPTP connections. >> >> Right now I'm using a 3825, and based on CPU performance it looks like >> I'll be lucky to get 200 on this thing with my typical end use usage >> patterns. >> >> Cisco seems to be pretty poor with rating PPTP performance on their >> devices, and would rather talk about L2TP (I don't blame them - it >> appears that pptp support has been dropped from the ASAs entirely). >> >> Does anyone have any idea what would be a good box for 300 to 500 (or >> even more) PPTP connections? The old VPN3000s seem to support this, >> but I can't get any real numbers on how many connections I can >> realistically support. I was thinking of just finding some powerful >> CPU IOS boxes and calling it a day on this one. Any better ideas? >> >> Thanks, >> Daryl >> _______________________________________________ >> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ >> > > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
