According to a Pannaway SE who visited us a few years ago, he'd seen SPs
many times our size who used static routes for everything. He said we
weren't big enough to need a routing protocol. Of course he also said
that our pipes weren't saturated so we didn't need QoS and that IPv6 was
just a fad and would never be adopted in the US.
*sigh*
Ivan Pepelnjak wrote:
Gentlemen, you forgot about IDRP (http://www.javvin.com/protocolIDRP.html).
You can already transport IPv4 and IPv6 over CLNS, this is the next logical
step :D
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
