>-----Original Message----- >From: Eric Van Tol [mailto:[email protected]] >> >> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Justin Shore
>> >> IPv6 was just a fad and would never be adopted in the US. >> >Sadly, he's not too far off on this one. >> Totally disagree, but I might also be biased ... in several cases IPv6 >> already is deployed (within the US), but let's talk again in 1-3 years? >> /TJ >Let's see...from our "big carriers": >AboveNet: No IPv6 >Verizon: No IPv6 >Savvis: No IPv6 >Level3: No IPv6 >GBLX: IPv6! >Verio: IPv6! >Sure, we have some smaller providers and peers that run it, too, but until the >majority of our so-called "Tier 1" providers start deploying it *and making it >easy to request*, I stick to my guns by saying that he wasn't that far off. And therein lies the rub. The objection was to "never be adopted" ... I know several of the above (and other large carriers you omitted) have "started deploying it", but "started deployment" != "commercially available". (i.e. - not "easy to request". And for today, I totally agree ... that is why I said in "1-3 years".) /TJ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
