Why not use class-default? Kind regards, Sibbi
On 4.8.2009 20:36, "Walter Keen" <[email protected]> wrote: > While it may not be ideal, I've run into some cases where match any was > not available and matching an access list(that matched anything) was my > only viable option. > > Justin Shore wrote: >> I'm having a little trouble doing something that should be simple. >> I'm using a 3560 as a CPE to break up multiple services and bind them >> to unique switchports. I don't normally use 3560s for this. The port >> in question is for a 10Mbp PtP with no SLA across our backbone. >> >> What I currently have is apparently not doing anything and I fail to >> see the flaw in my logic: >> >> >> class-map match-all ALL >> ! >> ! >> policy-map Re-color-BE >> description Police to 10Mbps CIR - Re-color ALL to BE >> class ALL >> police 10000000 8000 exceed-action drop >> set ip dscp default >> >> >> This is my QoS trust boundary so I'm re-coloring to 0 and setting muy >> CIR to 10Mbps. The switch wouldn't let me define 'match any' in the >> class-map. I suspect that I'm not matching anything because of that. >> I want to match anything coming in that interface and police it to the >> CIR and drop everything else. I must be missing something but I'm not >> sure what it is. Is there something unique about this platform? The >> IOS is 12.2(50)SE1. >> >> Thanks >> Justin >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
