Hi Rodney, When the last outage occurred, I did a quick assessment of the output of those two commands and reviewed it with output while it was working - and nothing stuck out wrong or incorrect. I however, didn't do the sh mls cef. In a haste effort to get this particular customer up, I moved them back over to the older box and didn't save my vi buffers. I will have to setup a test link, as I can't have this PtP go down again. I was more/less looking for any input on any known difference between these two setups.
Thanks, -graham On 8/18/09 9:16 PM, "Rodney Dunn" <[email protected]> wrote: > You need to get more data when it's failing for anyone to help. > > sh ip arp > sh adj detail > sh mls cef <ip> > > as starters. > > > > Graham Wooden wrote: >> Update: I could not keep the link up on the Sup32. Even hardcoding the MAC >> addresses, traffic would flat stop at random times. However, it's been up >> for 4 days now on a Sup2. Specific interface/vlan config is exactly the >> same. Only differences are the Sups, IOS, and linecard. >> >> So, does anyone know what could be the issue? I really don't want them to be >> hanging off of this aging hardware... >> >> Works: 6509 - Sup2 - s222-adventerprisek9_wan-mz.122-18.SXF15a.bin - >> WS-X6248-RJ-45 >> >> Doesn't: 6509 - Sup32 - s3223-advipservicesk9_wan-mz.122-33.SXI1.bin - >> WS-X6348-RJ-45 >> >> On 8/14/09 7:00 AM, "Gert Doering" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 06:57:08AM -0500, Graham Wooden wrote: >>>> Agreed on the ip proxy-arp, but if it makes the link work for the time >>>> being >>>> ... >>> This would be VERY surprising - "ip proxy-arp" makes a difference only >>> if one of the devices sends ARP requests for IP addresses that are >>> off-link (specifically: that the router with "ip proxy-arp" knows to be >>> off-link and has a route for it). >>> >>> Your routers on both sides shouldn't do any ARPing for off-link addresses >>> unless one of them has a static route pointing to the ethernet itself >>> ("ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 ethernet0" is a quite typical example). >>> >>> dot1q-tagging the management interface sounds like a good plan, though :) >>> >>> gert >> _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
