Talk to your counsel about the compliance requests you get. You may be
able to get away without it, but you are required to comply with any
lawful requests, even if you don't like them. The same is true for any
business where you could get a lawful request for records.
Check out packetforensics if you need a device, much cheaper than
others in the space, their website can be a bit funny, but worth
having a [free] login.
- Jared
On Sep 4, 2009, at 4:07 PM, Scott Granados wrote:
Why does anyone comply with CALEA? Especially after the abuses of
the last 8 years and probably a lot farther back than that? I've
been reading about the requirements and the idea that ISPs cooperate
with law enforcement really makes me uneasy on a civil liberties
basis. Does Uncle Sam scare tactic people in to compliance? There's
just something about making things easier for the NSA and any number
of alphabet soup agencies that strikes me as unamerican (to use
their own phrase against them) and wrong. Or was it created simply
to create a new space for security products and C, J and the others
were really good at lobbying?
Since it doesn't require the ISP to break open encrypted traffic
it almost makes me think a public key system that lets the end user
encrypt everything from phone to television with their own keys
makes some sense so there's nothing left in the clear for
entertaining the James Bond crowd! Probably not practical at all but
this thread just convinced me not to use split tunneling.;)
----- Original Message ----- From: "david raistrick" <[email protected]
>
To: "jp" <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, September 04, 2009 12:40 PM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] OT - Dark Fiber
On Fri, 4 Sep 2009, jp wrote:
Regarding the topic... If someone provides dark fiber, would they be
subject to CALEA requirements to be able to tap and record the
I haven't followed CALEA-for-ISPs for a few years, but at least
when it was initially required, dark fiber providers won't need to
comply with CALEA. They're not providing network service. -lit-
fiber providers would because they're either providing network or
telecom service....but they generally wouldn't do it at the
physical layer.
...david
--
david raistrick http://www.netmeister.org/news/
learn2quote.html
[email protected] http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
