[email protected] wrote:
what’s wrong in extending your spanning-tree domain, as long as numbers of
nodes are not too many? People are using trunk links between different
sites across the world in an enterprise environment, and this is for what
you use a trunk link. I would prefer the usage of trunk links and routed
VLAN interfaces over EoMPLS and VPLS. (keeping in mind the throughput
issues on EoMPLS, mtu problems and overall network complexity)
Well, I think it depends on your existing setup and requirements.
The original poster states that they currently have *no* vlans between
sites; therefore any move to do this is a new service, with all the
learning experiences and issues associated.
The OP also says they're using VTP.
I agree with Oli: It makes sense to avoid this if possible. But it's a
matter of personal opinion.
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
