>From a routing perspective this makes sense. Will there be any adverse >effects if the Jumbo frames is bumped up anywhere in the chain? Meaning L2 >vs. the L3 Routing. I believe thats where the MTU path discovery comes into >play correct? Sorry to add to this but while we were on the subject I figured >I would ask :) We want to use jumbo frames in a few environments but not at >the cost of anything in the path.
Cheers, // LeBlanc On Dec 28, 2009, at 9:09 AM, Marko Milivojevic wrote: > On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 16:00, Mohammad Khalil <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> i have checked the mtu on 3750 >> sh system mtu >> >> System MTU size is 1500 bytes >> System Jumbo MTU size is 1512 bytes >> Routing MTU size is 1500 bytes >> >> but there is no such command on the 6523 > > Different beast, but at least you get the explanation. As far as > routing processes go, MTU on 3750 is 1500. On 6500 you can set it per > interface (depending on the LC). > > -- > Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 > Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert > > Mailto: [email protected] > Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 > Live Assistance, Please visit: http://www.ipexpert.com/chat > eFax: +1.810.454.0130 > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
