Is 12.2(46)SE6 the recommended most stable version then since it was the last supported version?
On Jan 6, 2010, at 3:47 PM, Hector Herrera wrote: > On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Jeff Kell <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 1/6/2010 4:55 PM, Jason Shearer wrote: >>> After reload, 3550 does not load share >>> >>> 1st Found-In >>> 12.2(35)SE >>> Known Affected Versions >>> >>> >>> Fixed-In >>> 12.2(50)SE >>> 12.2(50)SE1 >>> >> >> Well, that's a major crock-o-stuff, as 12.2(46)SE6 is the last >> officially supported/provided IOS release for that platform (other than >> the DC version). >> >> Jeff > > Yes, that is quite ugly. I'm currently using 12.2(50)SE3 on a > 3550-12T and the only difficulties that I have run into is a high ( >> 90% cpu load when total throughput on the load-balanced links reaches > 200 Mbps ). > > I am curious to find out if the high cpu load is caused by some > incompatibility between 12.2(50)SE3 and the 3550-12T (since the > version is not officially supported on the platform). However, this > bug (no load sharing after reload) is making me think twice about > testing 12.2(46)SE6. > > On the other hand, the bug fix for this issue could be the reason for > the high cpu load .... > > Out of curiosity, is anybody here using a 3550 to route more than > 200Mbps ( at about 40,000 packets per second forwarding rate ), I > would be interested in comparing cpu loads with or without > load-sharing. > > Thank you for all the copies of the bug that I received (both to the > list and privately). > > -- > Hector Herrera > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
