Ziv Leyes <[email protected]> writes: > And I'd like to set an appointment with all of them in let's say 20/30 > years from now and talk about it again.
If in lets say 20-30year we see that using /64 was a mistake and 2000::/3 is completely used there are several some more address pools that can be utilized with other polices. But this was already discussed more then once, just refer to e.g. the NANOG archives. Every argument pro and con /64 as smallest network has been posted there more then once. Jens -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Foelderichstr. 40 | 13595 Berlin, Germany | +49-151-18721264 | | http://www.quux.de | http://blog.quux.de | jabber: [email protected] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
