ASR1k is the place to look/be for this area.
Rodney
On 3/19/10 9:35 PM, Lee wrote:
We had a solution involving NAT on some 6500s - it didn't take long
for them to run out of memory& reboot. Cisco eventually said there
was a limitation of ~57K NAT translations on the PFC3B. We added a
ip nat translation max-entries 50000
to the configs and asked our security office to pretty please NOT do
any more Nessus scans<there>. That fixed the rebooting issue, but I
think we're back to not doing NAT on any 6500s now.
Regards,
Lee
On 3/19/10, Jeff Bacon<[email protected]> wrote:
I'm looking for something that can:
(1) handle about 100mbit (microbursting to gig) of mcast, taking it in
interface A and pushing it out interfaces B and C, and maybe D
(2) sustain 500-800mbit of throughput (assume 100-byte packets,
occasional gig burst) coming in interface B and going out C, just
straight routing
(3) NAT a few TCP streams coming in interface C and going out interface
A, none of which are anything big-shakes (meg or two of throughput)
This is going to be the backup box; the primary is going to be a
cat6500/sup720. I'm trying to avoid buying a second cat6500.
I'm guessing this is beyond what an NPE-G1 can handle. How about a G2?
If I have to buy an ASR, I'll just buy the 6500; I have a pile of 6500s
and no ASRs.
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
