Hi, On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 01:40:33PM -0700, Stephen Cobb wrote: > Mike's GSR idea would definitely be something to consider as well...since > you'd get a nice bang-for-your-buck on anything SONET. For example, a 4-port > OC12 blade (4OC12X/POS-I-SC-B, > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps6342/product_data_sheet0900aecd803fd7b9.html) > would run you less than a couple grand.
What engine revision is that?
As of today, I wouldn't buy anything that has problems with IPv6 - the
gear will be in service for 3 or 5 years, and what are you going to do
if your customers demand IPv6 next year?
(See other thread for GSR engines that do IPv6 well and those that don't)
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [email protected]
fax: +49-89-35655025 [email protected]
pgpys65jIauW9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
