Those specific ones are engine 3's, so they should work, fyi. Good call. On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Gert Doering <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 01:40:33PM -0700, Stephen Cobb wrote: > > Mike's GSR idea would definitely be something to consider as well...since > > you'd get a nice bang-for-your-buck on anything SONET. For example, a > 4-port > > OC12 blade (4OC12X/POS-I-SC-B, > > > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps6342/product_data_sheet0900aecd803fd7b9.html > ) > > would run you less than a couple grand. > > What engine revision is that? > > As of today, I wouldn't buy anything that has problems with IPv6 - the > gear will be in service for 3 or 5 years, and what are you going to do > if your customers demand IPv6 next year? > > (See other thread for GSR engines that do IPv6 well and those that don't) > > gert > -- > USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW! > // > www.muc.de/~gert/ > Gert Doering - Munich, Germany > [email protected] > fax: +49-89-35655025 > [email protected] > -- Stephen F. Cobb • Senior Sales Engineer CCNA/CCDA/DCNID/CSE/ASP/ATSA Telecoast Communications, LLC • Santa Barbara, CA o 877.677.1182 x272 • c 760.807.0570 • f 805.618.1610 aim/yahoo telecoaststephen _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
