Jack-- Could you please post the routing configuration and routing tables? That would help us determine why the selected route is via the path you do not want.
cjw > Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2010 19:03:42 +0530 > From: jack daniels <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: [c-nsp] EIGRP and BGP Administrative distance issue > Message-ID: > <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Hi guys, > > My office 2 is DR site of DR1..............All my traffic goes out to MPLS > remote sites via office 1 , and it goes out via office 2 only when office is > down ... > > Below is my office 2 network ....Network of office 1 and office 2 are > replica of each other. > > > > OFFICE 2 > > > MPLS router 1 MPLS router 2 > > > L2 Switch > > Distruition switch 1---------------Distribution Switch 2 > | | > | | > EIGRP DOMAIN > > || > > | > OFFICE 1--------------------MPLS Cloud > > > EBGP between - > > 1) DS1 and MPLS router 1 > 2) DS1 and MPLS router 2 > 3) DS2 and MPLS router 1 > 4) DS2 and MPLS router 2 > > IBGP > > 1) DS1 and DS2 > > At both DS I'm redistributing BGP to EIGRP ..... > > 1) My office 2 is learning MPLS routes as preffered routes from EIGRP domain > Office 1 > 2) office 2 is DR site , so all traffic should go via office 1 > 3) when traffic of users in office 2 reach distribution switch 1 or 2 , they > find EBGP route AD 20 and route via EIGRP 170 ... so they go out via office > 2 .Which is against requirement as its DR site only. > 4) so how to route traffic to MPLS via office 1 of users sitting in office > 2 ...??? > 5) and how to route traffic to MPLS via office 2 when OFFICE1 is down ...??? > > Regards _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
