cisco seems to know about -vrf option in outgoing ssh connections on 4500. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/docs/switches/lan/catalyst4500/12.2/53SG/configuration/vrf.html#wp1082522
As for copy you have to specify ip tftp/ftp source-interface to choose proper vrf (dunno if ip ssh source-interface will work for scp) On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 5:06 AM, Church, Charles <[email protected]>wrote: > Anyone, > > I'm wondering if there are any open feature requests or bugs > for cleaning up the remaining things that don't seem to work in VRFs. I've > resorted to the idea of using the global table for management on 6500s and > other devices for various things that don't like VRFs. But now I run into > the newer 4500 sups that have the dedicated 10/100 management port. These > ports are locked into a VRF called mgmtVrf. Can't change it. Find out > there are some important things that aren't possible using a VRF, such as > SSH client (can't connect to a host in a VRF) or pretty much any file copy > operation initiated from the switch. It'd be nice to use those ports since > they're usable from ROMMON for remote recovery (we've got term servers > attached), but this file copy feature is pretty important. Any idea? > > Thanks, > > Chuck > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
