On Sunday 25 April 2010 07:04:45 pm Farhan Jaffer wrote: > Thanks Mark for the update. > > Let's see how next generation of Transport Networks look > like!
It's very different from regular MPLS, with a number of features taken out to simplify things the way (I think) telco's would prefer them. Personally, I wouldn't run it, as it's probably easier to add OAM capabilities into existing MPLS (but that's likely because I'm already happy with IP/MPLS). However, it would very appealing to telco's who are hesitant to run packetized networks with the exception of Ethernet. Nonetheless, yes, I'd like to see what it looks like in the end (MPLS-TP). Cheers, Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
