Hi, On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 08:48:40PM -0500, Tony Varriale wrote: > From: "Gert Doering" <[email protected]> > > >(Regarding your question, I can't say. We decided to go for 6500 > >chassis and SX* IOS - to eventually get software modularity... > > And how's that working out for you?
Well.
- positive points: SXH/SXI seems to have less exciting and amazing bugs
than the SR* series. Most of the releases "just work" for us, even
though we hit some esoteric bugs every now and the.
- positive points: LAN cards "just work for us"
- we have only lab-tested SXI-modular so far, and it seemed to be
well-behaving - bit I'm a bit disappointed at the lack of visible
progress here, as in "no more patches" and "the modularity is not
*that* modular at all yet, with CDPd being the outstanding example of
an IOS process being made its own stand-alone routing daemon".
- negative points: RSP720 has a much faster CPU, and that's something
where the Sup720(-10G) could need some improvement...
Overall, we feel that *for us*, 6500+SX software has been the right
decision.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [email protected]
fax: +49-89-35655025 [email protected]
pgp0IhzU2eA2s.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
