Just wanted to add
- negative points: you lose TE support on etherchannel when you switch from SXF
to SXH/SHI
:)
Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 08:48:40PM -0500, Tony Varriale wrote:
From: "Gert Doering" <[email protected]>
(Regarding your question, I can't say. We decided to go for 6500
chassis and SX* IOS - to eventually get software modularity...
And how's that working out for you?
Well.
- positive points: SXH/SXI seems to have less exciting and amazing bugs
than the SR* series. Most of the releases "just work" for us, even
though we hit some esoteric bugs every now and the.
- positive points: LAN cards "just work for us"
- we have only lab-tested SXI-modular so far, and it seemed to be
well-behaving - bit I'm a bit disappointed at the lack of visible
progress here, as in "no more patches" and "the modularity is not
*that* modular at all yet, with CDPd being the outstanding example of
an IOS process being made its own stand-alone routing daemon".
- negative points: RSP720 has a much faster CPU, and that's something
where the Sup720(-10G) could need some improvement...
Overall, we feel that *for us*, 6500+SX software has been the right
decision.
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
